Emoluments are a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office.
The Emoluments Clause of the US Constitution aims to prevent corruption and foreign influence on government officials.
The Qatari Jet Controversy
When Donald Trump accepted a 747-8 luxury jetliner from the Qatari government, it raised concerns of a potential violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the US Constitution, which prohibits federal officeholders from accepting gifts, payments, or titles from foreign governments or the US government without the consent of Congress.
I doubt Donald Trump, who demonstrates ignorance and disdain for our Constitution on a regular basis, give’s a flying fuck about the Emoluments Clause. According to Donald Trump, “It would be stupid not to take the gift.”
Here are the tids and the bits:
- Qatar reportedly gifted a luxury Boeing 747-8 to President Trump, intended for use as Air Force One and later transfer to his presidential library.
- Critics argue this is a clear violation of the Emoluments Clause, especially since the jet is valued at $400 million or more.
- Legal experts and former ethics officials say the gift appears to benefit Trump personally, even if routed through the U.S. military.
- A DOJ memo reportedly justified the acceptance, but its contents haven’t been publicly released and are now the subject of a lawsuit
And although Trump claims the plane is a “GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE,” the American taxpayer will foot the bill for retrofitting the plane, just so our American Dumbo can fly his Qatari Jumbo.
The cost estimate for retrofitting the gifted jet liner for presidential use is between $400 million and $1 billion or more, the latter amount taking into consideration advanced security systems, encrypted communications, anti-missile defenses, and a full sweep for espionage threats.
The Qatari Jet Controversy isn’t the only potential violation of the Emoluments clause. Here’s a look at other Trump political initiatives and actions that have enriched him personally during his presidency.
Political Initiatives that Enriched Trump Personally
Retention of Business Empire
- Trump refused to divest from his businesses while in office, maintaining ownership and control of the Trump Organization.
- His properties—including hotels, golf courses, and real estate—continued to operate and profit during his presidency.
Foreign Government Patronage
- Over 150 foreign officials from 77 countries stayed at or hosted events at Trump properties.
- The Chinese government alone reportedly spent at least $5.5 million at Trump-owned venues.
Domestic Government Spending
- U.S. government agencies spent taxpayer money at Trump properties, including Secret Service lodging and event hosting.
- State governments also used Trump venues for official functions, raising concerns under the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
Promotion of Trump-Branded Products
- Trump promoted personal products like branded Bibles, cologne, and even guitars during his presidency.
- His media ventures, including Truth Social and Trump Media & Technology Group, gained visibility and investment while he was in office.
International Real Estate Deals
- Trump’s business pursued or maintained real estate developments in Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the UAE, some allegedly funded by foreign entities.
- These ventures continued without congressional approval, despite constitutional requirements.
Emoluments Clause Violations? You Be the Judge!
The U.S. Constitution contains two key provisions:
| Clause | Description | Alleged Violation |
| Foreign Emoluments Clause | Prohibits federal officials from receiving gifts, payments, or benefits from foreign governments without congressional consent (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) | Trump received millions from foreign governments via business transactions without congressional approval |
| Domestic Emoluments Clause | Prohibits the president from receiving any benefit from the federal or state governments beyond salary (Article II, Section 1, Clause 7) | Trump profited from federal and state spending at his properties |
Should a sitting president be allowed to retain ownership of private businesses that receive payments from foreign or domestic governments? This question strikes at the heart of the Emoluments Clause debate. Trump’s refusal to divest created a direct conflict of interest and undermined the Constitution’s anti-corruption safeguards.
Thoughts?
If you haven’t had a chance yet, please check out my book, My Paper, My Words: Rantings from a Progressive Boomer and Peeved Parent, from Amazon. And if you feel moved to write a review of the book, on Amazon, or anywhere else, I’d be honored.
My Paper, My Words is a collection of essays, stories, and poems reflect the challenges of a middle-class husband and father trying to navigate a rapidly changing political, religious, and technological landscape of post-911 America.
bendingtheneedle 